Are we safe?

By Dale Landrith Sr. | Jul 11, 2019

On Monday morning, June 24, I was making an overnight business trip to the northern Adirondack Mountains in New York. The weather was decent and the expected tourist traffic was not too bad. Wending my way through the western mountains of Maine and into New Hampshire, my thoughts were only on the trip before me and enjoying an area that I love to experience. Heading west a short ways out of Gorham, N.H., the traffic slowed and there seemed to be something causing the proverbial rubbernecking. To my astonishment, I had come upon the scene of a horrific motorcycle crash of the previous Friday. The scars and stains upon the roadway provided a vivid picture of what had transpired. The embankment on the opposite side of the road showed graphic evidence of the crash and the burning of the pickup truck. My mood went from enjoying a drive to one of somber reflection on the horror experienced by those bikers.

The image of that short trip through the accident site and my return trip on the same road has stayed with me. Scores of miniature flags were placed along the road, with folks walking along the shoulder, including some who looked very much like family. Having read many articles about the crash, one thing stands out very clearly: the man, Volodymyr Zhukovskyy, should have not been driving that truck, or any vehicle, for that matter. He had numerous traffic accidents, an OUI driving conviction, and a drug-related arrest. The Department of Motor Vehicles in Massachusetts had completely messed up.

It has been revealed that the Massachusetts DMV had thousands of notifications from other states that had not been processed over an extended length of time. The government agency charged with the safety of its citizens was not competent in keeping them safe. In addition, the company that owns the pickup truck and trailer Zhukovskyy was driving has a very suspect history of safety violations itself. Twenty percent of its safety inspections turned up deficiencies. Its DOT permit should probably have been suspended long ago. The system failed those bikers. One would hope that Maine has the necessary checks and balances in place to make sure that we do not have the same problem here.

Having reviewed a number of court cases, I found what I have observed over many years, in that the legal system does not necessarily protect us from serious and habitual repeat offenders. Many times in court cases we see that someone is convicted and then all sentencing is suspended. This does very little to deter someone from committing the same act again. Frequently we observe that people are charged with driving with a suspended license, and it goes without saying that they had a disregard for the conviction for the first offense.

There should be severe repercussions for driving with a suspended license. There is also a new terror on the highway. Not all that long ago, when reading about an OUI offense, the listing would simply say “OUI”. Now it reads “OUI alcohol.” Why the change? There are now new categories because of substance abuse, which is primarily caused by the legalization of marijuana.

It should not be unreasonable to expect that more can be done to keep us safe on the road. All of the defensive driving techniques ever suggested would not have prevented what happened to those bikers. The person who crosses the center line could very well be any one of us. With the technology available today, laws could be in place that allow for cross-checking between traffic offenses and drug offenses. Those cited for drug offenses or driving violations could be reviewed to see if the offender is a danger on the road. I suspect that the family and friends of those seven New Hampshire bikers would support more of an effort to keep folks safe.

If you appreciated reading this news story and want to support local journalism, consider subscribing today.
Call (207) 594-4401 or join online at
Donate directly to keeping quality journalism alive at
Comments (4)
Posted by: Harold Bryson Mosher | Jul 14, 2019 04:43

Let me get this straight.  In the USA some of the mentally ill can get treatment but they can all buy firearms?


Posted by: Francis Mazzeo, Jr. | Jul 13, 2019 11:20

Driving is a privilege not a right. Drivers refuse a blood test for one reason, fear of failure. With implied consent they can get the charge reduced to driving to endanger. They lose their license but they don't have an oui on their record. Not everyone takes this route because it is quite costly.

Posted by: Daniel G Benson | Jul 12, 2019 22:24

Actually the Maine law for OUI (for other than alcohol - i.e. drugs) has been around for 29 years. It became effective July 14th 1990. The OUI per se law became effective Sept 18th 1981. I think the next one next should be OUI - DD (not Dunkin Donuts; but Distracted Driving!).

Posted by: Dale E. Landrith Sr. | Jul 12, 2019 19:26


I am an ardent supporter of the 2nd Amendment to the U S Constitution.  However, I completely agree that those with mental health problems should have their ability to possess firearms suspended or terminated.  I believe that the medical community and the ACLU have been stonewalling mental health professionals from cross checking with each other.

If you wish to comment, please login.